- 1. “Malebranche” in The Oxford Handbook of Berkeley (Oxford University Press, forthcoming)
- 2. 「무엇이 인간을 인간답게 하는가: 도덕적 존재의 조건」,『인간을 다시 묻는다』,서울대학교 인문대학 편 ( 서울대학교 출판문화원, 2020)
- 3. “Conservation as Continuous Creation: Just Like Creation but Not Necessarily Recreation” in Occasionalism: From to Science, ed. by Matteo Favaretti Camposampiero, Mariangela Priarolo & Emanuela Scribano (Brepols, 2018)
- 4. “Berkeley on Continuous Creation: Occasionalism Contained” in Berkeley’s Three Dialogues: New Essays, ed. by Stefan Storrie, (Oxford University Press, 2018)
- 5. 「철학은 왜 하는가?」,『인문학의 성찰과 전망』(사회평론, 2018)
- 6. “Causation” in TheRoutledgeCompanion to Seventeenth Century Philosophy, ed. by Dan Kaufman (Routledge, 2017)
- 7. “Leibniz’s Criticism of Occasionalism as Spinozism,”『철학사상』55호, 2015.2 (Chul Hak Sa Sang, Journal of Philosophical Ideas55, Feb. 2015) , pp. 139-178
- 8. “Are Mere Occasions Enough to Sustain a Malebranchean Theodicy?: A Leibnizian Reaction,”『중세철학』20호2014 (Philosophia Medii Aevi, vol. XX, 2014), pp.102-103
- 9. “버클리의종교철학”,『서양근대종교철학』,서양근대철학회엮음,창비(2014.1), pp. 294-320 This is a paper on Berkeley’s philosophy of religion and will be included in an anthology on the philosophy of religion in modern philosophy. The volume is being edited by the Society of Modern Philosophy in Korea.
- 10. “Toward a New Reading of Leibnizian Appetites: Appetites as Uneasiness,” Res Philosophica, 91, No. 1, January 2014, pp. 123–150
- 11. “Philosophy in its Place and Time: A Trans-Pacific Perspective,”『철학사상』48호, 2013.5 (Chul Hak Sa Sang, Journal of Philosophical Ideas 28, May 2013) pp. 265-282
- 12. “Malebranche on Necessary Connections, Omniscience, and Omnipotence,” Debates in Modern Philosophy, edited by S. Duncan & A. Lolordo (Routledge 2013), pp. 106-116
- 13. “Berkeley on the Activity of Spirits,” The British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20:3 (2012), pp. 539-576
- 14. “버클리-정신과관념의이원론,"『마음과철학』서양편상,서울대학교철학사상연구소엮음,서울대학교출판문화원(2012) pp.275-300. This paper (“Berkeley – The Dualism of Spirits and Ideas”) was published as part of a multi-volume series entitledThe Mind and Philosophy(Seoul National University Press),intended to provide readers with an in-depth introduction to the views of various philosophers on the nature of minds and mental activity.
- 15. “명저탐방:라이프니츠의<변신론>,”『철학과현실』2011년가을호, pp.244-252. This paper on Leibniz’sTheodicyaims to provide the reader with an understanding of the main themes and arguments of this work, and how it fits into Leibniz’s overall philosophical system.
- 16. “Leibniz on What God and Creatures Cause,” Natur und Subjekt: IX. Internationaler Leibniz-Kongress Vorträge Teil, Hannover (2011), pp.591-601
- 17. “Leibniz, Divine Concurrence, and Occasionalism in 1677,” in The Philosophy of the Young Leibniz, Studia Leibnitiana Sonderhefte Band 35 (Franz Steiner Verlag 2009), eds. Mark Kulstad, Mogens Laerke, and David Snyder, pp.111-20
- 18. “Occasionalism,” TheStanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ occasionalism/), posted October 2008, substantive revision October 2019
- 19. “Necessary Connections and Continuous Creation: Malebranche’sTwo Arguments for Occasionalism,” Journal of the History of Philosophy, vol. 46:4 (October 2008), pp. 539-565
- 20. “Passive Natures and No Representations: Malebranche’sTwo‘Local’Arguments for Occasionalism,” The Harvard Review of Philosophy, vol. XV (Fall 2007), pp. 72-91
- 21. “Leibniz on Spontaneity,” Einheiti n der Vielheit: VIII.InternationalerLeibniz-Kongress,Vorträge Teil, Hannover(2006), pp. 440-447
- 22. “Leibniz on Divine Concurrence,” The Philosophical Review, vol. 113:2 (April 2004), pp. 204-248
- 23. “Scotuson the Will: The Rational Power and the Dual Affections,” Vivarium, vol. 36, no. 1 (March 1998), pp. 40-54